The upcoming archaeological investigations now scheduled for early January (2008) are intended to uncover some important components of the eighteenth century Walled City of Charles Town. We are hopeful that we can locate, map, and study the remains of the redan and the lower market that were located on the site. Here’s a sneak peek at what we’re looking for.

Tradd St Redan, 1739

The Redan
This small structure, known as a redan, was part of the main line of colonial fortifications that faced Charleston Harbor. This line of brick fortifications was begun along the east side of the Bay Street in the 1690s. Based on European fortification design principles of the day, the angled walls of the redan allowed the five or six cannon mounted within to fire at a wider range of potential targets, and thus better protect the curtain wall and the city from naval assault. When it was built three hundred year ago, the Cooper River washed the redan’s brick walls at high tide. Since that time, the mud flats on the east side of East Bay Street have been built up with silt, ballast stones, trash, and other materials.By 1784 or 1785, when the redan at the east end of Tradd Street was finally removed, an extensive wharf stood between it and the channel of the Cooper River. This extension of Tradd Street is now known as South Adger’s Wharf.

The Lower Market, 1751-1799
A major fire in November 1740, which burned nearly half of Charleston, destroyed the Exchange and Court Room that had recently been built at the east end of Tradd Street. The site sat vacant for several years, except for the presence of the brick redan at the foot of Tradd Street. In 1750 the S.C. legislature approved the building of a new market on a growing wharf on the east side of the brick redan, and construction continued into 1751. From the 1750s onward, the structure was known as the “Lower Market,” to differentiate it from the Beef Market (the site of present City Hall), and provisions of all kinds were sold here, but not slaves. According to a resolution of Charleston City Council in late 1785, after the old brick redan was finally removed, the Lower Market was enlarged, however, it was still too small to accommodate Charleston’s growing market needs, and the site was becoming too congested by the post-Revolutionary expansion of the wharves. In an effort to consolidate the city’s market activities in the new Market Street, this market was closed in 1799, and the city sold the property in early 1800.

Many in Charleston have heard members of the Mayor’s Walled City Task Force talk enthusiastically about the anticipated archaeology at South Adger’s Wharf. Yes, funds have been made available to initiate that work, a team has been assembled, and detailed plans have been formed. But, alas, no earth has yet been turned. The work that was tentatively proposed to commence in mid-October has been repeatedly nudged back from week to week as the contractors and subcontractors working on the adjacent utility project have worked diligently to complete their final tasks. The final clean-up of their site is nearly finished, however, and will soon leave only the asphalt blacktop at South Adger’s Wharf–the proposed dig site–to be removed. The holiday season is now upon us, though, rendering it nearly impossible to muster and the necessary forces to start the dig and to sustain the momentum required to complete it. In short, the postponement continues.

After weighing the factors, the powers-that-be have agreed that we will earnestly plan to commence the archaeological dig at South Adger’s Wharf in early January. This final delay will allow the various contractors time to fulfill their obligations and will permit the Walled City Task Force and its volunteers to disperse for the usual holiday festivities. This dig is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, so we can easily wait a few more weeks. Come January, however, we hope you’ll put on your caps and scarves and join us for what will surely be a remarkable discovery process!

This week, while re-reading the 1706 journal of the South Carolina Commons House of Assembly, I came across a bit of colorful text that had previously escaped my attention, and I thought others interested in Charleston’s early fortifications might find it interesting.On 7 March 1705/6, at the opening of a new legislative session, Governor Nathaniel Johnson delivered a speech in which he reminded the House of its duty to provide for the proper defense of the young colony. As was customary, the House then appointed a committee to draft a formal reply to the governor’s speech, and on 12 March they presented their draft before the full House. After it was read and approved, the Speaker of the House, Lt. Col. William Rhett, affixed his signature to the message and then ordered it to be sent to the governor. Among the obligatory formal language contained in the reply, the House expressed its concurrence with the governor’s concerns about the state of the fortifications, and included this metaphorical phrase:

It is no Doubt a Duty which we owe to God and ourselves[,] to the present Age and to Posterity[,] to Improve the Opportunity God gives us of ffenceing [sic] our Vineyard; and makeing [sic] the Hedge about it as Strong as we can.

At this time, Charleston (then called Charles Town) was a heavily fortified, walled settlement. It was the political capital of the infant colony, the sole port and market, and the store of nearly all the provincial armaments. In comparing the town (and, by extension, the colony) to a vineyard surrounded by a hedge, the members of the Commons House used their linguistic skills to help us, more than 300 years later, to understand the importance and value of their efforts to defend the once struggling colony that we now take for granted.

If you happen to be combing through books and the Internet for information about forts and fortifications in early South Carolina history, you’re likely to encounter an illustration titled “Arx Carolina,” along with a vague description of its subject. I’ve been asked about this image several times recently, and I’ve discovered a number of contradictory explanations. Let’s see if I can briefly set the record straight.

arx_carolina.jpgArx Carolina is the title of an engraving by Arnold Montanus first published in Amsterdam by Dapper in 1671—one year after the English-Barbadian settlement at Albemarle Point in Carolina. It depicts a triangular fort based on contemporary European designs, and includes corner bastions, wooden revetments, a moat, drawbridge, and gate. Some history texts identify this fort as the early English settlement of Charles Town at Albemarle Point, while others claim that it represents the fortifications at New Charles Town on the peninsula between the Ashley and Cooper Rivers. There are also writers who state that it depicts the brief French settlement of Charlesfort on Parris Island, South Carolina, and still others that identify it as the French settlement of Fort Caroline near modern Jacksonville, Florida. So which is it? 

In his Narratives of Early Carolina (1911), page 140, Alexander S. Salley Jr. cites Thomas Ashe’s 1682 publication Carolina; or a Description of the Present State of that Country, which identifies “Arx Carolina” as the fort built by Jean Ribault and his followers in 1562 on what is now known as Parris Island, South Carolina. Salley states that the name is the Latin form of “Fort Charles” or “Charlesfort,” and was named for King Charles IX of France. Yates Snowden’s History of South Carolina (1930), volume 1 page 31, however, identifies “Arx Carolina” as Fort Caroline at the mouth of the St. John’s River in Florida.

Ribault’s settlers abandoned Charlesfort in 1563, barely a year after its creation, and the next French attempt at settlement in the New World was planted at the mouth of the St. John River, near modern Jacksonville, Florida. In mid-1564 French settlers erected at that site a fort that English-speaking historians call “Fort Caroline.” A year later, in the autumn of 1565, a Spanish force destroyed Fort Caroline and replaced it with a fort of their own. The French counterattacked in April 1568, however, and burned the Spanish fort, which the Spanish abandoned the following year in favor of the new settlement of St. Augustine. If you’re curious, The History of Beaufort County, South Carolina (USC Press, 1996), volume 1, pp. 23-28, includes a good description of this period, and the South Carolina Institute of Archaeology and Anthropology has a website devoted to the Santa Elena and Charlesfort.  

It is clear that the 1671 engraving of Arx Carolina does not depict either the 1670 or the 1680 English settlements of Charles Town. It is not entirely clear, though, whether this image depicts the French settlement of 1563 at Parris Island or the 1564 settlement at Jacksonville. It is significant, however, that Montanus’s 1671 image of Arx Carolina was reprinted ca. 1710 with the subtitle “Charles Fort, sur Floride.”

Yes, I’ll agree that it’s an interesting and historically significant illustration, but we have to remember that it was created more than a century after the subject it depicts was wiped off the face of the earth, and the artist certainly never laid eyes on the fort. Arx Carolina represents an important chapter in the early contests for settlement in North America, but it doesn’t have any direct connection to the fortifications of colonial Charleston, South Carolina.

This Thursday, October 18th, you’re invited to join members of the Walled City Task Force and the Young Advocates of the Historic Charleston Foundation for a fun and educational evening. It’s time for the autumn “Walk the Walls” event, and the weather should be just right for a bit of history, food, drink, music, and conversation under the stars in Charleston. Come join us at 40 East Bay Street at 6:00 p.m. for a self-paced stroll along the path of Charleston’s early defensive walls. At significant points along the way, you’ll meet interpreters who’ll help breath life into the history of that site. We’ll finish the evening off with dinner and music harbor-side at the Missroon House, where you’ll have a chance to chat with other “walled city” enthusiasts. Besides having a great time, you’ll be contributing to the Task Force’s preservation efforts.

I hope to see you there!